ARCHIVES 1995-2002
Review Archive of Hillary Clinton Forums Starting from 1995
Over 68,000+ pages in seven years.
To Leave Your Own Message for Hillary Please
Scroll Down to the Bottom of this Page
www.hillary.org
editor@hillary.org
senator@clinton.senate.gov
September 20, 2002, 9:00 a.m.
Revenge and Competition
Why the Palestinians keep terrorizing.By Gerald M. Steinberg
ISRAEL — Israeli analysts and officials knew that the six weeks of relative quiet between bombings was never more than a temporary lull. Although the security operations have severely curtailed the Palestinian capability to launch terror operations, explosives stockpiles imported in the past decade have not all been uncovered, and suicide bombers remain at large. A combination of very detailed intelligence and good luck prevented a number of attacks, including mega-bombings on their way towards Israeli cities. However, to mark the anniversary of the beginning of the campaign of terror two years ago, a wave of suicide/homicide attacks was expected.At the same time, an increasing number of Palestinians finally recognize that Arafat's campaign of violence has been entirely counterproductive. Instead of enjoying the end to 50 years of violence based on a negotiated compromise, the decision to pursue terrorism destroyed the Oslo process and Palestinian credibility.
Around the world, sympathy for Palestinian victimization is slowly evaporating. As the details of the history of hatred and violence are reexamined, the grand myths blaming the violence on "occupation" and "settlements" are unraveling. The Palestinian political and diplomatic position has been set back by at least 20 years, and the primary association with terrorism and hatred has returned. Following the American lead (albeit reluctantly, as always) the international emphasis is now on regime change and replacing Arafat, and the pressure on Israel has been reduced.
The foundations of economic cooperation have also been destroyed, and as a result, the Palestinians are poorer than ever and isolated in their cities and villages. Without any hope for a serious negotiated settlement, Israelis are turning their energies towards the construction of a barrier to separate the populations and reduce their vulnerability further. Contrary to expectations, the Israeli public did not buckle under the wave of attacks, and has emerged as strong and determined as ever. As in the U.S. after September 11, the brutality of these murders has reinforced the sense of national purpose and resolve. As a result, Palestinians who examine their situation realistically have started to recognize that regardless of the level of terrorism that Israel might face, the outcome will not change. This realization led members of the Palestinian legislature to challenge Arafat's leadership, marking a major departure in the Palestinian Authority and in the wider Arab world. In addition, some leaders in the Fatah and Tanzim groups also understand that their situation will only grow worse with more terror attacks. However, unless they are willing to take the risks necessary to control not only Hamas and Islamic Jihad, but their own former supporters, the agreement between them to end attacks in Israeli cities will have little impact.
In this atmosphere, the main sources of continuing terror attacks are emotional and irrational demands for revenge and competition for leadership and power. The vengeance resulting from deep hatred and anger cannot be eliminated through negotiated agreements, but requires intensive security measures to destroy the explosives and unravel all of the terror networks. Arafat has never moved in this direction, and the competition between Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other militias is likely to grow until all these groups are dismantled by Israeli security.
The ritual speeches and formal statements issued by Arafat and other PA officials after each terror attack reflect the continuing double game. Discussions of a temporary ceasefire are only designed to legitimize continuing attacks against "military targets" (in the Palestinian code, meaning all Israelis), while providing immunity to the terrorists.
As a result of all these factors, the Israeli security forces will intensify measures to destroy the remaining elements of the terrorist networks, including those portions that are located within the Israeli Arab cities and villages. In addition, the process of disengagement from the Palestinian population will be accelerated through the construction of barriers and other mechanisms. Rational Palestinians leaders who understand the futility of terrorism are likely to become more active, if for no other reason that the welfare of their own people. The anger and demands for revenge will remain until a generation of Palestinians are educated without deep hatred and incitement.
— Gerald Steinberg teaches politics and heads the Program on Conflict Management and Diplomacy at Bar Ilan University in Israel.
| Name: | Klaatu |
![]()
EDITORIAL: Bring Arafat to his knees
For the second time in less than 24 hours, Israel yesterday was struck by a Palestinian suicide bomber intent on killing as many Jews as possible.
Just a day before the onset of the joyous Jewish festival of Succot, a terrorist boarded a No. 4 Dan bus in front of the Tel Aviv Great Synagogue on Rehov Allenby carrying a large bag packed with explosives.
When the bomb went off, the blast could be heard throughout the busy downtown area, shattering the afternoon bustle and sending a chilling reminder to all Israelis that the war on terrorism is far from over.
Both Hamas and Islamic Jihad were quick to claim responsibility for the bus bombing, which left five Israelis dead and 74 wounded, included one in critical condition who is now fighting for life. A visibly stunned Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer visited the site of the attack, and appeared overwhelmed by the carnage around him. Even rescue workers hardened by the experience of the past two years described a scene of unspeakable horror, with body parts strewn about, and seats on the bus drenched in the victims' blood.Not surprisingly, the attack elicited the usual responses from the Palestinian side. Speaking with the Associated Press, Hamas spokesman Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi said he welcomed the bombing, asserting that, "The Zionists are paying for the crimes and terrorism of their leaders." The Palestinian Authority issued a laconic statement, which spoke of a general condemnation of the killing of civilians, without specifically denouncing the attack on the bus itself.
Moreover, the statement failed to call for an end to all terrorist attacks against Israelis, and merely bemoaned the fact that such incidents give "Sharon's government and his occupation army the pretext to continue killing, to continue the siege and to continue settlement activities." That hardly qualifies as a ringing denunciation of terror.
More important, though, is how the government reacts. Last night, for the first time since the suicide bombing at the Park Hotel in Netanya on Pessah eve, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon convened a special session of the full cabinet to discuss the security situation and Israel's response. With the meeting in full swing, the IDF sent tanks and troops to surround Yasser Arafat's offices in Ramallah, effectively isolating him and some 20 top terrorists who have sought refuge in his compound .
Though Sharon insisted to his ministers that all discussions and decisions remain secret, the media were quick to suggest that a number of measures were under consideration, including increased military pressure, greater diplomatic isolation of the PA, and a tightening of various restrictions on Palestinians that had previously been eased.
If all this is starting to sound vaguely familiar, that is because this is precisely the course of action that the government had been implementing for much of the past half-year. There was plenty of tough talk, and even some tough action, but just when it seemed as if the pressure were beginning to have an effect, Sharon yielded to the pressures at home and abroad and began to loosen the IDF's grip.
Indeed, in recent weeks it seemed as if Sharon were beginning to lean toward reopening the channels of communication with the PA. Israel began transferring funds to the PA which it had previously frozen, a number of high-level meetings were held between Israeli government ministers and Palestinian officials, and the American CIA was allowed to launch a training program for Palestinian security cadets. The military was also pulled back in various places, as Israel sought to implement the "Gaza-Bethlehem first" arrangement. But this approach, too, ultimately failed, as anti-Israel violence and incitement continued apace.
Though various foreign media outlets have been portraying the violence of the past few days as a break in the "lull" that had prevailed for the past six weeks, that is far from being the case. During the month of August, there were 393 Palestinian terror attacks, including shootings, mortar attacks, and roadside bombs. Hence, Sharon's softening over the past several weeks has proved demonstrably unsuccessful.
That leaves but one choice to undertake a sustained, ongoing military campaign with the express goal of compelling the Palestinians to surrender unconditionally. No negotiations, no talk of partial cease-fires or of limiting attacks to certain areas or certain types of Israeli civilians. All that has been tried, and it has failed. Pinpoint military incursions or even month-long protracted operations, such as Operation Defensive Shield, have not done the job either.Israel must now do what it has thus far refrained from doing it must, once and for all, bring Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian Authority to their knees, and put an end to their terrorist onslaught. Nothing less than a complete Palestinian surrender is necessary, and if the only way to bring that about is through the use of overwhelming military power, then that is what Israel must now do.
| Name: | Klaatu |
![]()
The unrecognized war BY SAUL SINGER
Today's "Friday" section leads with what should become a historic document: a roundup of well-known figures attempting to name the current war with the Palestinians at its two-year mark. Here is my own offering the Unrecognized War.
This obviously didactic name takes a cue from what Winston Churchill wanted to call World War II: the Unnecessary War. Churchill's point was that the allies could have easily prevented the war if they had stood up to Hitler while he was rearming, in violation of the Versailles Treaty, instead of sympathizing with German "grievances."
The current war was also unnecessary in an eerily similar manner, in that Palestinian violations of the Oslo Accords were ignored in the same way and anyone who objected was subjected to the same accusation of being "against peace." But the salient characteristic of this war is not that it could have been prevented, but our ambivalence over calling it a war in the first place.
For the first few months of what we are now calling a war, we may recall, the waning Barak and Clinton administrations were still busy sweetening the package offered to the Palestinians at the Camp David summit the previous summer. Even when Ariel Sharon was swept in by a landslide, largely because of public rejection of these months of "negotiating under fire," Yasser Arafat continued to be treated by Israel and the US as more of a lapsed partner than a military rival.
As late as September 2001 the issue here was whether Prime Minister Ariel Sharon would allow Foreign Minister Shimon Peres to meet with Yasser Arafat a potential diplomatic process that had the support of Defense Minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer and the US.
Even after September 11, Arafat was far from out of the picture. It was less than six months ago, in April, when Secretary of State Colin Powell was dispatched to meet with Arafat, presumably because he was still recognized not only as part of the problem, but as part of the solution.
None of this behavior much resembled what we normally call war. In a war opposing forces normally try to deprive the other side of the ability or will to fight back. It has been widely noted that the Palestinians wage war differently, since they mostly skip around Israeli forces and instead target Israeli civilians.
But Israel too has not fought normally, because it has remained well shy of toppling the central authority to which it attributes full responsibility for the war.
No one doubts that Israel has the power to take over whatever territory it wishes and evict Arafat from the area. One can argue the merits of Israel's tactical decision not to do to the PA what the US did to the Taliban, but it was a decision, not a function of the limits of Israeli power. It was a decision, further, that raises the question of whether, even now, Israel is acting as if it is fighting a war.Though considerably less so, similar questions can be raised about the American "war against terrorism." While the US was not found talking to the Taliban or Saddam Hussein the way Israel was talking to the regime it holds responsible for waging war, there is similar fuzziness both in defining the enemy and in the less than all-out means used to defeat it.
To this, a defender of the Bush Administration might say that a step-by-step approach should not be mistaken for a lack of determination or clear thinking. When Saudi princes are hosted at Bush's ranch it may not look like the US is at war, but there is a method to its meandering. In a war, one may choose to fight on different fronts sequentially, rather than all at once.
Yet, while I find this line of defense largely convincing, there is a pattern here of democracies having trouble matching the rhetoric of war with its full implications when attacked by an enemy that hides behind terrorist proxies. The Palestinian Authority hides (barely) behind Hamas and Islamic Jihad; Iran, Iraq, and Syria hide behind Hizbullah, al-Qaida, and numerous other terrorist groups.
And yet, by this simple, transparent tactic these regimes remained almost completely immune before September 11 and are still not except for Saddam, so far bearing the full brunt of enemy status as would happen in a real war. This is illustrated by how controversial it was when Bush dared label three such nations an "axis of evil" in January.
With that speech, and his historic laying down the gauntlet last week in the United Nations, it seems clear that Bush himself understands that we are at war. What is amazing, however, is how hard he must work at convincing the rest of the free world that this is the case.
| Name: | partof VRWC |
| To: | Forum |
| Name: | partof VRWC |
| To: | Uh OH |
Message:
RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - Israeli engineers began demolishing part of a building housing Yasser Arafat's offices and lodgings on Friday, and Palestinian officials warned the structure could collapse on their besieged president.
| Name: | Muslum HATER |
| To: | bordertex |
GO ISRAEL!! DEFEND YOURSELF FROM THOSE ANIMALS!!!
| Name: | Hadassah Madrassa |
| Re: | Arabs, Persians, Bedouins, etc. |
Message:
What is an Italian? An Italian is an Arab who has discovered the tomato.
| Name: | Nicco Necci |
| To: | Hadassah Madrassa |
Message:
Don't forget music and wine!
| Name: | Quote of the Day |
- Thomas Jefferson
| Name: | Wascally Webupwican |
| Re: | Dems a-poppin |
Message:
Record fines in ’96 Democrats’ case
Commission faults participants in foreign fundraising
By Thomas B. Edsall and Edward Walsh
THE WASHINGTON POST
WASHINGTON, Sept 21 — The Federal Election Commission disclosed yesterday it has imposed a record-setting $719,000 in fines against participants in the 1996 Democratic Party fundraising scandals involving contributions from China, Korea and other foreign sources.
THE FEC DOCUMENTS describe Democratic fundraisers who set specific prices for foreign nationals to make illegal campaign contributions in return for meetings with then-President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al Gore. A Democratic finance vice chair, for example, said organizers would have to contribute a total of $100,000 in return for Gore’s appearance at a Buddhist temple in Los Angeles.
Those penalized included the Democratic National Committee, the Clinton-Gore campaign, the Buddhist temple and nearly two dozen people and corporations acting as conduits for illegal contributions. All have agreed to pay, according to the documents.
The total in fines would have been significantly higher except that some of the corporations have folded and others were dummy operations, with no assets, set up as conduits for money from China, Venezuela, Canada and other countries. Foreign individuals and organizations are barred from contributing to federal elections. In some cases, foreigners who would have been subject to fines could not be located and served with papers. In other cases, which sometimes produced minor news coverage, the individuals pleaded guilty in criminal cases and are bankrupt.
The DNC was fined $115,000, the Clinton-Gore campaign $2,000, and the Buddhist Progress Society $120,000. In the conciliation signed by DNC lawyer Joseph Sandler, the party agreed to pay the fine and to “disgorge [another] $128,000” to the U.S. Treasury, representing illegal contributions that were not returned to donors.
In a separate document, the FEC said it decided to drop cases against contributors of more than $3 million in illegal DNC contributions because the respondents are either “are out of the country and beyond our reach, or corporations that are defunct.”
VARIETY OF ILLEGAL SCHEMES
In over 400 pages of documents, the FEC detailed a variety of illegal fundraising schemes in the 1996 Clinton reelection organization.
In some respects, the 1996 fundraising efforts by the Clinton White House and DNC were a Democratic counterpart to the Republican Watergate scandals of 1972. Just as Watergate was followed by the campaign finance laws of 1974 and 1976, disclosures of the 1996 activities played a crucial role in prompting Congress to enact the McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill this year.
The FEC describes how John Huang, a DNC finance vice-chair in 1996, “set a goal of raising $7 million from the Asian-American community.” This effort included the now-famous luncheon with Gore at the Buddhist temple, as well as a “coffee” at the White House and a “birthday dinner for President Clinton” at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York.
Huang, a central figure in the fundraising controversy, pleaded guilty in 1999 to conspiracy to defraud the FEC. He was sentenced to one year’s probation and fined $10,000. The FEC documents detail several illegal contributions stemming from Huang’s efforts, including:
$250,000 from Cheong Am America Inc., a subsidiary of a Korean firm, Ateck Co. “On April 8, 1996, Cheong Am officials met briefly with President Clinton and gave John Huang ... an envelope with a corporate check for $250,000 made out to the DNC,” according to the FEC. The amount represented $50,000 for each of the five company officials who met with Clinton.
Huang received $40,000 from Indonesian nationals Arief and Soroya Wiriadinata that was deposited in the DNC’s federal account in June 1996.
Huang accepted $327,500 from Pauline Kanchanalak of Thailand, who attended “a White House ‘coffee’ with President Clinton on June 18, 1996.” The FEC said Kanchanalak “paid a total of $277,500 for the coffee in installments” made out to state parties in order “to satisfy Pauline Kanchanalak’s desire to avoid media attention.”
The FEC documents indicate that Huang has agreed to pay a $95,000 fine.
$150,000 FOR CLINTON MEETING
The documents also describe how Robert S. Lee, a California developer, negotiated the price of a meeting between President Clinton and several executives of II Sung Construction, a Korean company. The documents say Lee met Larry Wallace, an Arkansas lawyer with ties to the DNC, to seek the meeting. Wallace told Lee “that he could arrange the meeting at a DNC fundraiser, but a donation would have to be made to the DNC.” Wallace and Lee “agreed on a figure of $150,000.”
The FEC fined Lee $250, noting that the penalty would normally be 200 percent of the violation, or $300,000, but Lee is $850,000 in debt and has already been sentenced to three years probation on a misdemeanor. The FEC documents are rich in detail on the behind-the-scenes world of political fundraising. They describe how Chien Chuen “Johnny” Chung brought 20 guests to a $1,000-per-person Clinton-Gore fundraising dinner in Los Angeles in 1995. Chung tried to pay for the dinner with a check for $25,000, but it was refused by Karen Sternfeld, the campaign’s deputy finance director for Southern California. She told Chung she needed 20 checks of $1,000 each from his guests. The next day, Sternfeld asked Irene Wu, an employee of Chung’s company, about the 20 checks, but was told the guests had scattered and the checks could not be obtained. According to the documents, Sternfeld said the checks did not have to be from the people who attended the dinner, and directed Wu to meet her at a restaurant later that day to deliver the money. The documents said Wu and others then collected 20 checks of $1,000 each from “conduits,” who were promised they would be reimbursed, and Chung later withdrew $20,000 in cash from his bank accounts to repay the conduit contributors.
| Name: | Clint Eastwood |
| Name: | Katherine Hepburn |
Message:
I've had a wonderful life as a woman.
| Name: | Michael Jackson |
| Re: | The Black & white of it... |
I've had a wonderful life as a woman.
Message:
I've had a hellava life as both!
| Name: | Tonto |
| To: | Wascally Republican |
Sorry but that baloney doesnt work in the next fall election in November.
Vote out the smart Republicans who turn surplus into deficits and dont know how to balance a budget or get people jobs.
| Name: | Tonto |
| To: | Smedley |
| Name: | Shrink-wrap Hippopottamus |
| To: | Tonto Noto |
| Re: | Toadstool Frieze In Black Marble |
Message:
DemoDroid Alert!
Sorry, 'Droid, but that baloney won't work in the upcoming election.
| Name: | Belle Plain College |
| To: | Bouffant Bettye |
| Re: | annoying static cling |
Message:
Pop up eradicator. (Get Billy Mays while you're at it!)
| Name: | Pepe' |
| To: | The Forum, |
| Name: | Kemosabe |
| To: | Tonto |
| Name: | Nootrac Rezloushen |
| Re: | The government IS a corporation |
Message:
Does that toliet paper come from Joliet Mills?
| Name: | AAAAHIIIIEEEEEE! |
| Re: | He's everywhere! |
| Name: | raymond burr |
| Name: | smeddles |
|
To view a home page, enter a screen name: |
Q: Why are the home pages ugly in this 'improved' version? A: Because I'm working on the system. It will look better when I am finished. |
|
! HAL9000 - Links to News Sources (v 1.7) |
Hi, I may be the only person here who qualifies himself as "utilitarian", which means that I think society should be structured to maximize happiness of the masses. However, I believe that my philosophical view is waaay more aligned with conservative and libertarian views than leftist views as I think that maximizing happiness starts with a broad base of personal freedoms unhindered by unnecessary government intervention. On the other hand, I think that various government programs, including welfare, CAN benefit practically everyone when used as a tool to get people back on their feet and paying their share of taxes. Unfortunately, our government likes to hand out entitlements like PEZ. The Democrats do it because they don't mind spending other people's money to attract votes; the Republicans because they're often too spineless to fight the issues. |
| Name: | Sul Rost |
| To: | 5th comumn al-quaeda Lawyer lover |
| Re: | And one was visiting his mommy who wore combat boots |
By Christine Haughney and Michael Powell Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, September 20, 2002; Page A06
BUFFALO, Sept.19 -- A lawyer for a Lackawanna man described his client today as a loyal American who went to Pakistan seeking religious training and through his own naiveté wound up spendin ...
Message:
More lawyers who should be in prison for dreaming up perjurious excuses for client's AID and COMFORT to
the Enemy."
Anybody know if the shooters were caught that shot employees trying to get into CIA compound 2-3 years back?
How about the shooter in the small gray foreign car that was shooting dope pushers in Washington DC? Or did the
police let him "bag his limit"?
| Name: | Semolina Pilcher |
| To: | Macaroni Jack |
Message:
Praise be to Allaah.
The wife’s approval is not a condition for plural marriage, and it is not obligatory for the husband to have the approval of his first wife if he wants to marry a second wife. But it is good manners and kind treatment to approach the issue in such a way as to reduce the pain which women naturally feel in such cases, by smiling at her, greeting her warmly, speaking nicely to her and spending money on her according to his means, in order to gain her approval. Fataawa Islamiyyah, 3/204.
| Name: | magpie |
| Name: | Alfred Krupp |
Message:
I am offered a job in a company with very good benefits. My part is to do research with pig embryos in the company's laboratory. The ultimate objective of my research is to improve the production and genetic quality of pigs (i.e. more pigs with good meat characteristics) to the market for human food consumption. In other words, the source of my salary comes from the consumption of pig meat (pork) which is haram. My question is: Is this money halal and I can take the job, or should I decline it? I apreciate your quick response to give my word. Jazakumu Allahu Khairun
| Name: | ghost |
| Re: | finally, somebody with a non-profit that makes sense! |
http://www.pave-france.org/
| Name: | Benther Dunthat |
| To: | Those who kill infadels |
| Re: | http://www.counterpunch.org/bodycount.html |
Message:
Who did the Serbs kill to get US into the fray on the side of KLA (Drug Pushing Socialistic Muslims) later granted assylum
in USA for no apparent reason. Follow the money to lawyers pockets. Follow the rate of drug-related crime escallating. Follow
50,000 new immigrants to poor Missouri which now has to cover up a crime wave to save Gephardt. What did Missouri ever do
to you, Senator Gephardt?
| Name: | Red Easily |
| To: | Tylerite |
| Re: | Let down by a Palestinian-loving Anti-Semite media ,,,AGAIN. |
Message:
Our US anti Semitic mass media mentioned very few of these. Arafat and his hoods getting theirs was made to look heavy-handed
and sudden and unprovoked. Shame on the New York Times and others for this "over=looking of Palestinian hostility and terrorism.
May God be with the Israelis until that murderous lived-way-too-long Arafat and his benefactor Saddam are "retired" to much deserved graves
and their sould headed for the unquenchable fires of Hades.
| Name: | Mycroft Holmes |
Message:
oh oh oh ouch.
| Name: | Gephardt |
| To: | Missouri |
Message:
Screw you Mizz oo ree! I represent East Saint Louis.
| Name: | French Milkmaid |
| To: | Stable boy |
| Name: | Mimir |
| Name: | Jupiter Eyes |
| Re: | Phut. |
Message:
In 2001, after sharing some common experiences in the desert of their home state of Utah, Lowe and (Scott) Free walked away from their established sound as a hard edged industrial/electronica act and began composing and recording in a dance genre called hardtrance. Europe and some parts of the USA were already deep into several forms of trance at that time, but this was hardtrance with a theme - the power and enduring force of The Sun, the desert and the inumerable entities that dwell within it in the cultural memories of so many Indigenous tribal peoples. The project which changed their sound came to be called "The Dance of Johona", named after the Diné (Navajo) Sun God. To make the change complete, they shortened their name from Fervid Torpor to FT.
| Name: | Mickey Mouse |
| To: | Mousekateers |
| Name: | Minnie Mouse |
| To: | Mickey |
| Name: | Independent Voter |
| To: | Terry McCauliffe |
| Re: | Terry McCauliffe's earlier remarks |
The Republicans in the US Congress did not investigate their rich buddies who helped the Repbublican Party (swine) get elected so that the CEO's and their friends could rip off the American Workerss 401K's to the tune of 1.5 Trillion Dollars.
The Republican Party is the party for the rich famous and notorious businessmen who are dirty crooks flat out.
| Name: | Charles DeGaulle |
| To: | the cowardly Frenchmen in France |
It took 4 years before the Americans, British, and Cannadiens landed on Normandy, France on June 6, 1944.
Lots of French Jews were rounded up by French Police with the help of the French Vichy and sent to death camps.The Nazis did not do it all alone, they had some Frenchmen who sold out or looked the other way.
Now in Israel, again mad suicide bombers commit attrocites toward civilians in the name of Allah.
The Israelis are just defending themselves.
You French cowards could not fight in WWI in WWII and French Indo China re ...
Message:
| Name: | Right on Bordertex |
But somehow they lost to a Democratic President who wasn't one of them.
So what did the Republicans do smear Clinton on everything while the Corporations who elected these puppets (of the the Republicans party)Beginning in 1992 the Republicans seized control of the US Congress; and get one thing straight right now with this right wing creepos who insist on being the doormats for republicans and who bend down on their knees to lick like puppies the evil hand of the extreme right Republican party.
it is not the Democratic Party who has been lazy, it has been that during the Clinton eight year terms when the republican party was in the majority in Congress, not much happened. and fighting against our real President Clinton and the enforcement of the "ban on assault weapons" which was the right thing to do on behalf of law enforcement and civilians but the republican party did not think it was important to ban "cop killer bullets" and fought the Democrtic Party all the way on many issues including the Democratic attempt to raise the minimum wage which just did not happen it seems that when the republicans were in the majority in congress all that did happen was that Corporations got all the loopholes they could get and got away with Chapter 11 with their all their fraud because this is what happens when a Corporation has placed their political puppet in office who is today george walker bush so lets not say the "modern day democrat lazy recipient" and let us agree that if Corporate Industry did not own the republican party, perhaps our environment would have stood a chance but with the Polluters running the show in the Federal Government only ruin can await the ordinary American while the Corporate puppet finds all the time to spark unecessary wars and the funds to fund the lunacy by Israel on Palestine I would appreciate this magpie piece of flesh and bone to remember that there is nothing dumb about being able to post our views with the truth but the truth bothers this darn republicans so much,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,that now even Palestine is not safe from George Walker Bush who is the real danger in our Country today when the only lazyiness in our Country is in the reluctance by the republican Congress to find the time to bring to justice the Corporate Fraud in American and
| Name: | British-American (oh gee I'm hyphenated) |
| To: | Sul Rost |
The two Muslim extremists were captured and deported so they can kill again elsewhere.
3)How about the shooter in the small gray foreign car that was shooting dope pushers in Washington DC? Or did the
police let him "bag his limit"? They never caught the small grey sedan sniper. He did stop after six and Mayor Barry
quickly replaced the fallen heroes of the Revolution Against Decency.
*****Speaking of your Mayor Barry, how many persons of color have been mayors of large cities and ruined their budgets
with helping black business, filling all city jobs with blacks, and filling all teacher jobs with blacks? You may speak for
WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 — The Democratic National Committee has agreed to pay civil fines and turn over to the Treasury a total of $243,000 to settle accusations that it took more than $1 million in illegal foreign contributions in 1995 and 1996, according to Federal Election Commission records released today. The documents also state that the election commission's general counsel found in 1999 that there was "reason to believe" that the People's Republic of China "knowingly and willfully" violated federal election law. But the heavily redacted documents also state that the commission voted unanimously to "take no action at this time" on the general counsel's recommendation. The documents detail efforts by the Democratic Party and the Clinton-Gore campaign to build their war chest with help from wealthy Asian donors before the 1996 election. In all, the election commission disclosed $719,500 in fines today. The largest fine, $120,000, was paid by the International Buddhist Progress Society, which operates the Hsi Lai Temple in California, the site of an April 1996 luncheon attended by Vice President Al Gore. {Yeah, the affair that Al Gore didn't know was a fund raiser } The national committee paid a $115,000 fine and agreed to turn over to the Treasury $128,000 it had received in illegal contributions. The Clinton/Gore '96 Primary Committee paid a $2,000 fine, the records also show. John Huang and Yah Lin Trie, two Democratic fund-raisers who pleaded guilty to violating federal laws, agreed to pay fines respectively of $95,000 and $7,000. The commission also found "probable cause" to believe that Hogan & Hartson, a Washington law firm, violated election laws in the handling of $50,000 in donations that a client of the firm made to the national committee in summer 1996. Two officials at the firm who were involved in the handling of the donations have agreed to pay a total of $67,500. Representatives of the national committee and for former President Bill Clinton declined to comment. Officials at Hogan & Hartson did not reply to a phone message. After the fund-raising scandal broke in late 1996, the Democratic Party returned $3 million in questionable or improper contributions, much of it from money donated or solicited by Mr. Huang or Mr. Trie. Kent Cooper, a former election commission official who is now at PoliticalMoneyLine.com, which tracks money in politics, said some fines disclosed today appear surprisingly low. The election commission, he said, limited the fines assessed to some people based on their claims that they could not afford to pay more. "Some people will look at this and say the F.E.C. should have fined them more," Mr. Cooper said. He noted, for example, that the election commission waived fines against a company called Global Resource Management based on the assertions by the company's president about its "present financial circumstances," the documents show. The election commission found that the company, which was formed in Ohio in 1996 to resolve a "construction-related contractual matter" in Saudi Arabia, decided to make a $100,000 contribution to a national committee fund-raiser in New York on Aug. 18, 1996. The event was also billed as a 50th birthday celebration for Mr. Clinton. The company's officers made the contribution in order to meet with Ray Mabus, the former Mississippi governor and ambassador to Saudi Arabia, who helped plan the event, the election commission found. But the money used to make the contribution was provided by Sheik Mohammed Oboud Al-Amoudi, a Saudi citizen, who wired $150,000 to the company. The company used this money for the donation "even though its officers had been informed that foreign national contributions are illegal," the election commission found. Mr. Cooper said the documents provided further evidence of the tactics Democratic operatives used to raise money before the 1996 elections. "Here, we're dealing with wire transfers and shuffling money to accounts," he said. "What is going on here is warning bells are going off all over the place."
And we have no contingency fees, you mush pay from somewhere.
2) Anybody know if the shooters were caught that shot employees trying to get into CIA compound 2-3 years back?
cities you know about but do not necessarily live in.
Message: Name: thefixfailed Democrats Are Fined $243,000 for Fund-Raising Violations
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr - The New York Times -
September 21, 2002