Electronic Democracy, P.O. Box 1687, Sausalito, CA 94966
HILLARY CLINTON FORUM
Send E-mail to:editors@hillary.org
Photo courtesy
of Hillary's Hair. http://www.hillaryshair.com.
To Leave Your Own Message Scroll Down to the Bottom of this Page
Click here to
review the original 1995 Hillary Clinton Defense Forum
Click here to review the 1996
Hillary Clinton Defense Forum
Click here
to review the 1997 Hillary Clinton Defense Forum
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to the Jan/Feb 1998
White House Sex Scandals
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to the Feb/March 1998
White House Sex Scandals
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to the March 1998
White House Sex Scandals
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to the April 1998
White House Sex Scandals
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to the May - June 1998
White House Sex Scandals
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to July 28,1988 when supporters
on the Hillary Clinton Forum urged President Clinton to "Ignore the Subpoena!".Includes
some messages from the Drudge Report Attack before site was hacked down.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to Monica Lewinsky's semen-stained
dress.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES relating to Monica Lewinsky's semen-stained
dress.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 15 relating to President Clinton's August 17th speech.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 16 Discussion subsequent to President Clinton's August 17th speech,
including the tie scandals.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 18 Will the President Recover? Bombing Afganistan.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 19 Thinking on the Beltway in contrast to the rest of the USA.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 20 Will the President Recover?
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 21 August 28 - September 1st.- Abortion, Gun Control, Russia, Clinton
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 22 September 1st.-7th. Dan Burton
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 23September 7th - 11th Kenneth Starr Delivers Report
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 24 Discussions on the Ken Starr Report to Congress.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 25 Hillary Clinton's documents
on Nixon's impeachment.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 26 Photos and descriptions
of Clinton's affairs.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 27 Discussions on perjury.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 28 Video Tapes Released!
Big surprise - Clinton's ratings go up!
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 29 Right-Wing extremists
attack on forum. Hacked, disabled, sexual abuse. Forum shut down for three days.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 30 Hillary Clinton in San Francisco. Very popular and very presidential. Fundraising Dinner for Barbara Boxer sold out! Editors of Hillary Clinton Forum invited to attend.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 31 Special Conservative Forum for
Anti-Liberal and Anti-Clinton messages.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 32 It's not sex, or even perjury, it's a Right-Wing COUP!
Dysfunctional Democracy - The Triumph of Theocracy.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 33 Bad News for the GOP - Significant
loss in polls after
release of the videos on the Internet.
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 34 Peace Accord in the Middle East.
H.RES.545 - SPONSOR: Rep Hastings, Alcee A resolution impeaching Kenneth W. Starr,
Click here
to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 35 Halloween. HUGE Voter turnout expected in
California. Judge orders Starr investigation.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 36 Democrats Win Big! Americans Send
a Message to Republicans - Drop it!
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 37 Why the GOP lost
the November 3rd Elections. Discussions on abortion.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 38 Thanksgiving. House Judiciary Committee
holds impeachment hearings. Kenneth Starr in Congress. Hillary Clinton Forum Featured in
THE TIMES of London
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 39 Republicans on the
House Judiciary Committee
recommend impeaching President Clinton. Straight party line of 21-16, setting up historic political showdown.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 40
Hillary Clinton Forum in Newsweek .
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 42 US Bombs Iraq. Bob Livingston Outed by Larry Flynn!
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 43 Bob Livingston Resigns in disgrace.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 44 Clinton Impeached on two counts by Kangaroo court. GOP Commits Political Suicide!
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 45 Clinton's Popularity Hits New High! Promises never to resign. Halts strikes on Iraq.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 47 Merry Christmas. GOP Hypcrites outed by Larry Flynn - Citizens and media begin attacking the Radical Right.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 48 Happy New Year. Larry Flynt and Tom DeLay driving GOP Agenda.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 49 Senate Impeachment Trial begins.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 50 Republicans try to smear Clinton with Danny Williams paternity suit.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 51 Senate begins Impeachment Trial. Bob Barr & Trent Lott's connection to white supremacists.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 52 Martin Luther King Day.
Clinton's State of the Union Address Brilliant Success. 77% Approval rating.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 53 GOP Self Destructs. Conservatives attack their own GOP leaders.Secret meeting with Monica.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 54 GOP Self Destructs. Pat Robertson Retreats. Bob Barr disavows the CCC.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 55 GOP Self Destructs. Larry Rockefeller's Call to Republicans.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 56 Impeachment Trial - Larry Rockefeller's call to Republicans.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 57 Impeachment Trial - Just one more week and it's over!
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 58 Teletubbies furor. Tinky Winky outed by Jerry Falwell.
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 59 President Clinton Acquitted on Both Charges!
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 60 Should Hillary run for President, Vice President or
Senator of New York?
Click here to review PAST MESSAGES on FORUM 61 Culture Wars
Name:
email:
Message: GOP-Run Congress Drops Further in Polls
Public unhappy with impeachment probe
New York Times
With midterm elections less than three weeks away, support for the Republican-controlled Congress has eroded significantly in the aftermath of the House vote to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Clinton, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll.
The 105th Congress is now widely perceived as having invested too much political capital in impeachment and having accomplished little on a broad array of issues of importance to voters, from protecting Social Security to improving managed health care.
Approval of Congress has dropped from a high of 56 percent in September to 43 percent as the House has been consumed by the charges leveled against the president independent counsel Kenneth Starr.
Nearly half of all voters said that the Republican-controlled Congress had accomplished less than a typical Congress. Most Americans could not name one accomplishment of the Congress this year.
Clinton's support, by contrast, remains as strong as it has ever been during his presidency, with 63 percent approving of how he is doing his job. On foreigh policy, 60 percent approving of how he is doing his job and 70 percent approve of his stewardship of the economy.
Name: Andrew Sullivan
email: American conservatism - what has gone wrong?
Message: I stopped reading the Starr report when it simply became obvious that the narrative, compelling and lucid as it was, seemed to be building a case not so much for the President's public, legal impropriety but for a private, moral iniquity. And I stopped reading not because I sympathize with President Clinton's repeated public lies, or his abuse of power and of his office. ( I still think he should resign.) Nor because I am instinctively a liberal. I stopped reading at some point because it became depressingly clear that the Starr report and its aftermath represents not simply a case study in what has gone wrong with an American Presidency, but also a case study in what has gone wrong with American conservatism.
While Bill Clinton, by his failure to settle, and then to apologize, and then to tell the truth, was responsible in the first place for nine months of trauma, he was not responsible for the prurient, lip-pursing moralism of the report, nor for the subsequent, egregious outspilling of grand-jury testimony. Proof of perjury or obstruction of justice required non of this, as most Americans immediately understood. This moral obsessiveness was the creation of Kenneth Starr and something far larger than Kenneth Starr. It was the creation of a conservatism become puritanism, a conservatism that has long lost sight of the principles of privacy and restraint, modesty and constitutionalism, which used to be its hallmarks.
This scolding, moralizing conservatism is one with a lineage; it is the construction of a cadre of influential intellectuals who bear as much responsibility as anybody for the constitutional and cultural damage this moment may have already wrought. And they will bear an even greater responsibility if the ultimate victim of this spectable is the reputation and future of conservatism itself.
More Bad News for the GOP
Inquiry backlash heartens Democrats
” Republican leaders face the risk of another backlash from within their own ranks. THE AD BUILDS on the Democrats’ repeated charge that the impeachment inquiry is being masterminded by House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who, they say, will stop at nothing to destroy Clinton’s presidency.
Addressing the camera directly, Inslee says in the ad: “Rick White and' Newt Gingrich shouldn’t be dragging us through this. Enough is enough.” Some of the melancholy that had settled over Democrats before last week’s House vote to launch a formal impeachment inquiry has been dispelled by: Anecdotal evidence of public impatience with the impeachment inquiry, as measured by constituents’ phone calls and letters to members of Congress; and a new Washington Post poll showing that 62 percent of the 802 adults surveyed disapprove of the way the Republicans in Congress are handling the issue of impeachment. Democratic pollster Geoff Garin said, “Thanks to the Republicans, it’s a lot easier being a Democratic candidate now than it was a month ago.
” More at msnbc
Name: Andrew Sullivan
email: PORNO-PURITANISM - The degenerated conservative political and literary culture.
Message: The issues that are driving the Republican base this fall have little to do with economics or politics or national security. They are issues of morals: infidelity and honesty, abortion, family cohesion and homosexual legitimacy. Much of this, as has been widely reported, is because of the evangelical Protestants who now make up the Republican activist base. The new moralism has been enforced with a rigidity that puts old-style leftists to shame. It is an orthodoxy, to put it bluntly, of cultural and moral revolution: a wholesale assault on the beliefs and practices of an entire post-1960's settlement.
The centrality of this moralism to the Lewinsky saga was perhaps best put by David Frum, one of the brightest of the young conservative thinkers now writing. "What's at stake in the Lewinsky scandal," Frum wrote candidly in the Feb. 16, 1998, issue of The Weekly Standard, a conservative magazine, "is not the right to privacy, but the central dogma of the baby boomers: the belief that sex, so long as it's consensual, ought never to be subject to moral scrutiny at all."
It would be hard to put better what was so surprising, and so dismaying, about the Starr report and the Republican Congress's subsequent behavior. In their universe privacy is immaterial, hence the gratuitous release of private telephone conversations, private correspondence and even details of the most private of human feelings. For these conservatives there is only a right, as Starr revealingly wrote, to a "private family life". A private, nonfamily life is fair game for prosecution and exposure.
No conservative thinker has done more to advance this new moralism than William Kristol, who edits, The Weekly Standard, founded in 1995 by Rupert Murdoch.
But perhaps no edition of The Standard captured the current state of American conservatism better than the one that came out immediately after the Starr report. Six pages of explicit sex. One of the many graphic scenes in the article occurs in a ladies restroom: "Unprompted, Dr Susan Block removes a rubber phallus from her purse and hikes up her assistant LaVonne's dress, baring her derriere. Block paddles it and kisses it while LaVonne coos." The wierd porno-puritanism of the Starr report does not exist, it seems, in a vacuum. It comes out of a degenerated conservative political and literary culture.
Name: More Bad News for Conservatives
email: MNSNBC
Message: Spotlight moves
from Clinton
to prosecutor
Starr’s methods, means
under increasing scrutiny
By Brock N. Meeks -MSNBC
WASHINGTON — As both sides prepare for battle over the fate of President Bill Clinton, the investigation that led to this historic showdown comes under increasing scrutiny. Kenneth Starr maintains he has done what he was hired to do: investigate the president impartially and fairly. But reports now point to a special prosecutor working closely with the president’s deepest enemies from the start.
Name: Gary Cicott
email: Aquarius Productions
Message:
Name:
email:
Message: What do you call 9 days of giving head?
Monica Chanukkah
Name:
email:
Message: Attorney General Janet Reno:
"A cultist is one who has a strong belief in the Bible and the Second Coming of Christ; who frequently attends Bible studies; who has a high level of financial giving to a Christian cause; who home schools for their children; who has accumulated survival foods and has a strong belief in the Second Amendment; and who distrusts big government. Any of these may qualify a person as a cultist but certainly more than one of these would cause us to look at this person as a threat, and his family as being in a risk situation that qualified for government interference."
Janet Reno, Attny. Gen., US of A
Interview on 60 Minutes, June 26, 1994
We have identified the enemy and must do everything in our power to eliminate them from our society. We may only be free when the voices, desires and lives of these people are extinguished.
Name:
email:
Message: 
Name:
email:
Message:
(Button Credit: Drew Julian)
Petition & Protest
Against Kenneth Starr's Vendetta
DRAFTED 8/4/98
This website does not circulate any newsletters. And anybody that abuses the names on this newsletter will be reported to the proper authorities. Harassment is illegal.
*********NEWSFLASH*********
Check out the New York Times Story today on my articles link: http://members.aol.com/shyone8950/articles.html
In today's Times, the front page article tells of how Starr lied about hearing about Monica from Tripp. It details the conservative conspiracy. email Reno to investigate starr-----she was duped. Faxing and calling might be better. This is a good step towards finally telling the truth, but one thing is still missing.......the Scaife connection.
And this one: http://www.msnbc.com/news/201340.asp
The Demonstration in Washington D.C. is planned for Saturday Oct 24,1998 at Noon and I hope some of you can attend it. It will be at the Ellipse (site was changed). Please let us get the word out for this. We should thank Darrell Hampton, who is the wonderful man that actually got the permit for the rally. You can reach him for more info at: DHH44@aol.com or his voicemail is: 937-274-9095 or contact Sue Wilson and let them know if you're interested and how you can help. They need people in many capacities : info@truthinamerica.org
*****NEWSFLASH******
Congressman Alcee Hastings of Florida(D) got on the floor of the House and asked for the resolution to Impeach Kenneth Starr.
H.RES.545 - SPONSOR: Rep Hastings, Alcee (introduced 09/18/98) A resolution impeaching Kenneth W. Starr, an independent counsel of the United States appointed pursuant to 28 United States Code section 593(b), of high crimes and misdemeanors.
We must contact his office and flood his mail box with mail in support of this resolution. Here is his e mail address:
Alcee.pubhastings@mail.house.gov
The E-Mail address for the Judiciary Committee is:
Write Janet Reno here:
The House Switchboard (in Washington DC) # is (800) 522-6721. They will transfer you to the legislator you desire ****note corrected phone number!!****
PLEASE let him KNOW that YOU SUPPORT this resolution. Show him your respect and gratitude for taking a STAND against the GOP.
This is it!!!! This is the moment we've waited for! I will send him the Petition, and to every member of Congress now.......I will continue to accept names, for this is not over yet!
Click here for: My Views on the Starr Referral
As Promised, articles that were written about Scaife:
This is from the Columbia School of Journalism Review http://www.cjr.org/html/81-07-08-scaife.html
and
From the ABCnews.com archives (maybe Peter Jennings needs to reread this one)
http://archive.abcnews.com/sections/us/DailyNews/scaife980611.html
This article appeared in the March 13, 1998 issue of Executive Intelligence Review
http://www.larouchepub.com/olson_starr_salon.html
********IMPORTANT UPDATE**********
Check and bookmark this link for important updates:
http://members.aol.com/shyone8950/update.html
Now that President Clinton has spoken, I think we are all wise to take his advice and turn off anymore of the trash that has been and no doubtely will spew out more in the coming days. Right Wing Republicans will try to argue, just refuse to listen. Turn off the TV when they start. Let the pundits du jour know that we aren't interested in what they have to say. The only way for this to close is for us to use that tiny little button on the TV and radio that allows us the final word - the off button, or at least change the channel, watch something totally void of politics. You should also call and/or write your newspapers and call a halt to the daily trash editorials, as well as the local and National News agencies. Let's now work within the system, through this Protest Petition to have Starr ousted and reclaim our Nation's future! (Link to letters of support at the bottom, along with a little bit about me). Remember, some extremist members of Congress have already started to use this for partisan commercials regarding their upcoming elections, let's not let it flourish.
Also, please remember that the Republicans are only a few seats away from having a filibuster-proof Congress, which means should they gain as few as 5 more seats, they will have not only the Majority, they will have over 2/3 majority. That means nothing but trouble for America. Instead, we need to turn this disgraceful abuse of power around. Even those who are not Democrats, those who aren't particularly happy with either party, must vote Democratic this November 3rd. If you think that the witchhunt has been bad for America so far, the nightmare of what it'll be like should they have 2/3 majority in Congress is something we must prevent!! If possible, we must return majority to the Democrats, and then make sure we hold them responsible for keeping their contract with America!!
Great article: http://members.aol.com/shyone8950/disgrace.html
Read below the petition for the complete explanation of ties between Starr, Scaife and Laurence Silberman, who is one of the 3 Judge panel overseeing Starr.
Write him here:
I highly suggest utilizing his fax number, and using his snail mail address. He has blocked the email, but we shan't be silenced!
Don't forget to send a copy to your Congressperson!
If you have trouble with the above sites, email me for a complete list
Senator Lieberman's address: Senator_Lieberman@lieberman.senate.gov
Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr
Office of Independent Counsel ( Private Law Office)
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Kirkland and Ellis
Suite 490-North 655 15th Street Fl. 12 N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004 Washington D.C., 2005-5793
(202) 514-8688 Telephone: (202)-879-5000
(202) 879-5130
Telex: 89-2320
Facsimile: (202)-879-5200
This email address blocked once again : kenneth_starr@kirkland.com
Web-Site: http://www.kirkland.com
Are you as tired as I am of the out of control Kenneth Starr? Are you happy with President Clinton and the job that he's doing? If so, join me and others to protest and demand that Kenneth Starr resign at once, and the Independent Counsel Office (Herein referred to as ICO) be disbanded immediately. To sign, simply email me with explicit permission to add your name and email address to the Protest Petition at ShyOne8950@aol.com. (If you're going to send me hate mail, at least have something intelligent to say!) I do suggest creating a secondary email address, there are free email addresses at Yahoo! and other places, if your ISP doesn't offer more than one screenname.
We, the undersigned, are fed up and hereby protest the McCarthyistic vendetta being pursued by Kenneth Starr. We know that he was on a mission to unseat President Clinton from the very beginning, since - as was reported on MSNBC (link to the article is to follow) - shows that Kenneth Starr was "on the short list to be nominated to Supreme Court Justice." The article goes on to explain how Judge Starr went out of his way to silently campaign for support to be nominated, being the only person to do so. He wanted this position very badly. He was close too, on a short list of 5 potential nominees. One problem arose, Bush was defeated in the '92 election, and thereby Starr's chance went out the window. Judge Starr has been on a rampage ever since.
Click here for MSNBC report on archive: http://www.msnbc.com/modules/starr/Appt.htm
Also in question - as reported by US News & World Report (link to article to follow) - is the moneyline that follows the beginning of the investigation to publisher Richard Scaife, a not so silent Right Wing Extremist who throws his money behind all Christian Coalition efforts. Especially those that try to hurt President Clinton.
To understand the motives, you have to understand the mentality of the last election when Bob Dole ran against President Clinton. The Republicans and the Christian Coalition joined forces to defeat the President. The Christian Coalition promised a wide voter base to "assure" a Republican victory, and the Republicans promised to back Christian Coalition (hereafter referred to as CC) agendas. Both thought it was a foregone conclusion, and luckily both were wrong. The only problem, once the Republicans slept with the CC, they handed over the party reigns. Even though they lost, the CC had infiltrated enough seats to take control. The Republican party as we knew it had died.
Also reported in the US News & World Report report, the detective that "spilled the beans" in the original article that started the whole Paula Jones mess admitted he lied! He never even gave a last name, yet suddenly the Christian Coalition found her. The article was published in a magazine owned by Richard Scaife. Thus, the moneyline has reached back into the Christian Coalition. Read the entire story and you'll get the complete facts.
Click here for US News & World Report Article http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/980209/9right.htm
Also, Mr. James Carville's website has been taken down. It had some wonderful information regarding Starr's excesses, including a book deal Starr was proposing. However, an even better reference is his new book And The Horse He Rode On. Buy the book, and use the form letter in the back to send in your receipt to Starr, to save him the taxpayer expense of sending you a subpeona, you know - when it's your time around. Send it Certified, so that they have to sign for it and you get a receipt back.
We, the taxpayers are not fooled.
We, the taxpayers, are not in favor of this vendetta.
We, the taxpayers, want this country to stay a Democracy, we will not allow the USA to become a Theocracy or a Starr-like Dictatorship.
We, the taxpayers, do not believe that a Democratic Society as we live in should give one man so much power that he can do anything he wants. He is in effect creating new laws and this must be stopped.
We, the taxpayers, demand that President Clinton be allowed to continue doing the job that we proudly elected him to do.
We, the taxpayers believe that any man is entitled to a private life beyond his office. Nothing he has done in this case has affected this country adversely.
We, the taxpayers, believe that no man shall be isolated from counsel, not even the President of the United States!
We, the taxpayers, say those in Washington who have not sinned, cast the first stone. Those in glass houses......
We, the taxpayers, demand that Congress call for an immediate cease and desist to Kenneth Starr, and that Starr be impeached as Independent Counsel.
We, the taxpayers, demand that Congress dismantle immediately the office of IOC and close all offices connected with it.
We, the taxpayers, WILL REMEMBER who stirred the flames and backed Judge Kenneth Starr this coming November and those people will be replaced.
We, the taxpayers, WILL REMEMBER those that blocked badly needed legislation purely for partisan reasons, trying to stop President Clinton from accomplishing his duties and agenda.
Hereby signed with name and email address (all email addresses verified. If your name is missing, then I had a bad address for you):
Carol Levy ShyOne8950@aol.com
Glenda Ratliff uptwng@aol.com
John Machado MachadoPA1@aol.com
LU ELLA ACORN ACORN100@aol.com
Rick Lott rlott@smartlink.net
Phil Arthur BootStarr@aol.com
M connell CONN01@aol.com
G. Schmanski jerryski1@ aol.com
Richard A Oliveri SORBONE@aol.com
Mike Caetano lesbread@tomatoweb.com
Jeff Pedigo WolfPak081@aol.com
James F. Buchanan james-buchanan@adelphia.net
Barbara Pyle BARBARAPYLE@att.net
Howard Park Hpark4@aol.com
Deb Cunningham ICUland@aol.com
Ken Hosner mrbutton@cyberrealm.net
Skip Skip2403a@aol.com
Charlene Ward Presclectr@aol.com
Loreli Easterly goldcat@usa.net
Dustin Metzgar dlm420@yahoo.com
Sharon Metzgar dmetzgar@access.mountain.net
Mary Cheney naitan@hkstar.com
John Silver oldhipiie@aol.com
Glenda Cooper gcooper@aristotle.net
Valerie S. Wasserman Valerie002@hotmail.com
Mary C. Bowen macbon@director.monti.net
Mikki Robinson memikki@aol.com
Joe Fleming joebond@usa.net
Mary Jane MacElveen mamac1@pb.net
Gretchen Herren gretstan@mindspring.com
Marji Blackburn BB721@webtv.net
Carole Larsen ncsophie@dnet.net
Rob Robinson ba743@lafn.org
Max & Pat Hobbs MHPM@aol.com
Foy & George Pinson bunton@webtv.net
Drew Julian djulian@io.com
Michael O'Neill leoneill@email.msn.com
Elaine Coustin ElaineCity@aol.com
Donald Klopp Debigde@msn.com
Herb and Sue Propst Aimzq38@aol.com
Sherrie Gogerty cinymngirl@earthlink.net
Cat Lewis Catpik@aol.com
Glenn W. Sunderland GlennSunde@aol.com
Walter Evangelista WALT22@aol.com
James Osborn honnin@nwrain.com
Lallia Ramos LaliaRamos@aol.com
Maria Marchio mmarc37345@aol.com
Mickey Carcionne Melpk51@aol.com
Jerry Willard luter@worldnet.att.net
ANNE S REEVES areeves@thegrid.net
John Miller Sand-Man@mediaone.net
Ross Nielsen Ross.Nielsen@worldnet.att.net
Bill Weeden billyweeds@webtv.net
Gomer T. Ditty GTDITTY@aol.com
Cathrine L. Saalfeld TwoktzKate@aol.com
Mike Bianculli mbianculli@earthlink.net
Sue A. Sumner Inocnt4now@aol.com
Emil Cicchelli Cicchelli@email.msn.com
Philip J Ross Politiphil@aol.com
Connie Johnson conniewj@rconnect.com
Beverly Coleman RedFreedom@webtv.net
Rhiannon MacGregor rhiannon@geocities.com
Martha Wing beamemup@mt.net
Jamie Kettenhofen jamie@nsynch.com
Jennifer Ratliff Jmr113@aol.com
Uzo Nwokedi uzybone@hotmail.com
Laurence W. Curtis DPLA@aol.com
Joy Mcclellan & Paul Mcclellan pmac@pacificcoast.net
Kristen Downing notrnonred@aol.com
Carol L. Bond garallie@yahoo.com
Don Dyer bluecorn@webtv.net
Dian Day MdmKatt@aol.com
Jeanette Ballou goatcheez@kymtnnet.org
Douglas G. Farber DFarberEsq@aol.com
Nick Seidenman nicks@safari.net
Brian Drew bdrewla@earthlink.net
Barbara Kummerer mama_barb@hotmail.com
James Prim japrim@coop.crn.org
George Kummerer robogimp@fast.net
Catherine Westfall MyCatFract@aol.com
M. Nelsen Pryanka@aol.com
Cinda Adrian cindaa@ix.netcom.com
Shannon J. Bilger pete@acsworld.net
Linda & Pat McGonagill mcpatlin@fivearea.com
Grace M. Brown SeekDFacts@aol.com
Nancy Berry naclu@hiwaay.net
Roger Spawn rspawn@intcon.net
Alyx McNeal Owen alyxmc@mail.bigplanet.com
Rick Tyler tylerr@mcpherson.edu
Sam Hardman shardman@scruznet.com
Wayne Berry choochoo@sonet.net
Christy Saint csaint@getaway.net
Salvador D. Diputado salva@bit.mozcom.com
Douglas Aalseth d-aals@ngwmail1.ndis.umn.edu
Loretta Lambie Bauer donbauer@worldnet.att.net
Glenn Young abbaglen@ix.netcom.com
Jo Ann Nieman mtnawmn@digisys.net
Del McLaughlin gulliver@extremezone.com
Pam McCabe pampat@calweb.com
Robert L. Carter rlc1633@aol.com
A. Desiree & John M. Curtis mrpooh@deltanet.com
Sonja Nelson snelson@neonsys.com
John Holt jholt@cafes.net
Thomas M. Paulk TMPAtlanta@aol.com
Jim Lofrano jrcel@alaska.net
James Lyons Sand-Man@mediaone.net
Matt Ager mattager@pacbell.net
Michael U. Camacho Unpingco@webtv.net
Steve Jones atjones@sisna.com
Georgia Shriver trgs1@gte.net
K. Lee Maiwald kmaiwald@hannibal.wncc.cc.ne.us
Julie Stewart JULIET067@aol.com
Anneli Merich ANNELIX@AOL.COM
Tamara Baker khafara@aol.com
David M. Bergman Bergman100@aol.com
Kaja Graff ...
Name: Last Visible Dog to the Vast Lunatic Left (VLL)
email:
Message: I have used the term “lunatic-left” as humorous political banter – but after reading the previous irrational unibomber-like ramblings and nonsense, I think the term has far more relevance than I first realized. “Who cares if Bill “weasel boy” Clinton lied under oath on two occasions (two felonies) and lied on national television to ALL of the American people and put on a 7 month charade in a failed attempt to cover-up his web of lies (just like Nixon) – shoot the messenger, blame Starr” Give me a Clinton’s propensity to lie sized break. Beam me up, Scotty – there are no signs of life on the left side of the political spectrum in this country. Party-on lunatic-left dudes, -Last Visible Dog.
Name: Last Visible Paranoid Dog
email:
Message: Why are all my carriage returns being stripped out - is the Vast Lunatic Left trying to sabotage my messages.......they are everywhere, run for your lives!!! -Last Visible Paranoid Dog
Name: Last Visible Paranoid Dog
email:
Message: Why are all my carriage returns being stripped out - is the Vast Lunatic Left trying to sabotage my messages.......they are everywhere, run for your lives!!! -Last Visible Dog
Name: Last Visible Paranoid Dog
email:
Message: The VLL duplicated my last message just to make me look bad..... :-) -LVD
Name:
email:
Message: This election year is bringing several female candidates full circle to face the irony of their positions.
Barbara Boxer, Carol Moseley-Braun and Patty Murray are seeking second terms in the U.S. Senate.
All three are liberal Democrats, who rode the wave of outrage during the Clarence Thomas sexual harassment debacle in the fall of 1991.
All three of these women managed upset victories over their opponents.
All three benefited from the support of voters angered by hearings the male-dominated Senate Judiciary Committee conducted in 1991 into allegations that Thomas repeatedly used suggestive language toward Anita Hill when she worked for him.
All three now face uncertain futures because of the hypocrisy of their politics and abandoning the issue they championed when first elected.
All three face formidable opponents.
Boxer, who is related to President Clinton by marriage, perhaps is the most hypocritical and the most vulnerable.
She pounded the pavement insisting that Anita Hill be heard before Clarence Thomas’ confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court; and she led the way in denouncing Robert Packwood, the Republican senator from Oregon who was ultimately forced to resign over allegations of sexual misconduct.
Now, she and many others — who would have been satisfied with Thomas’ and Packwood’s heads on platters — are keeping their feminist mouths shut. They’ve displayed no outrage over the conduct of their lying, philandering president, who was messing around with one of his employees in the Oval Office.
If it’s bad for a Republican to paw and make lewd comments to his employees, then certainly it’s equally as bad for a Democrat to do it, even if he is the president of the United States.
And if it turns out that Barbara Boxer, Carol Moseley-Braun and Patty Murray aren’t re-elected this year, they’ll have no one but themselves to blame for abandoning a principle women’s issue.
Name: Witch Hazel
email: for Shyone
Message: We all thank you from the bottom of our hearts for gathering and putting up on the Hillary Forum your long and informative post about the VRWC and CC's attempt to become the Taliban of the United States. We liberals were feeling mighty lonely for a while, just talking to the hatemongers and superior Christians. Your post is just the tonic we needed! Restores faith in the American people. Apparently they have not forgotten that we declared independence to get away from religious persecution and being told what to do and think by the Christian scolds.
Name: Candace
email: CBrown2014@aol.com
Message:
Name: Kerri
email: Keri5643@aol.com
Message:
Name: Morton Kondracke
email:
Message: The Monica Lewinsky scandal has hit high culture. Distinguished writers regard it not as a tale of tawdry sex and perjury, but of American freedom menaced by ayatollahs, Torquenadas, McCarthyites and Salem witch hunters.
The menace is Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who is pictured as the leading agent in a right-wing Puritan conspiracy to remove that most precious of all American liberties.
It's not freedom of belief or expression, according to the authors ventilating in the New Yorker, the New York Review of Books and the New York Times, but the right to engage in sex anywhere, anytime, including in the Oval Office during working hours.
If the intellectual elites have anything to say about it, the Clinton scandal will become a more polarized cause celebre, a lever for deeper cultural division -- and, eventually, a piece of historical mythology. Someday, there'll be an opera.
The archetypes being drawn by authors such as Toni Marrison, Arthur Miller, E.L. Doctorow and Ethan Canin are of Clinton as a flawed but humanistic leader entrapped, victimized and, possibly, martyred by forces of antediluvian re religiosity
Polls suggest that a majority of ordinary Americans comes out in the same place as the intellectuals -- that Starr is biased and Clinton ought not to be impeached -- but at least most ordinary Americans think Clinton is untrustworthy and deserves censure.
Name: Last Visible Dog to Witch Hazel
email:
Message:
Well I can see you earned the first part of your moniker – my next thought is I guess the moniker “douche bag” was already taken. Judging by your message you must be VERY old, so I will talk slowly:
I did not think I was composing HTML here, old person, I was typing text into a text box only to have it strip out the returns. I guess you cats on the left don’t understand much about technology in general (you got tunnel vision)– spending most of your time hugging trees, worshiping inanimate objects (like toasters), and being grumpy and no fun to people around you. Lighten up member of the Vast Lunatic Left, propping up your man weasel boy is tough job and it would make anybody grumpy – but life is not all bad. Weasel Boy will be gone in at least 2 years (and a few months) – then maybe we can start healing the Clinton imposed wounds and we can start to undo all the damage Clinton has done to our society and political system. There is light at the end of the tunnel.
Jeepers, you liberals are nasty people
”can’t we all just get along…”
:-)
-LVD
Name: SF Liberals to Last Visible Dog
email: In Defense of Witch Hazel
Message: Now, LVD :-) this first thing I notice about you is that you want to be a nice person, and you would like "us all to get along." You do not want us to think you are just another hate-filled right-winger on this board...., BUT, you immediately go on the ATTACK! You called Witch Hazel a "douche bag" How disgusting can you get with such an ugly description? Are you demonstrating to us how "to get along?" Thank you, but no thank you for that one, LVD.
Then you refer to her as "VERY old" in derogatory terms. I don't know how old she is, and that does not matter. What matters is that you are prejudiced against age as most people are, unfortunately, and, furthermore you desire to be cruel and insult her because of her age. Is this another demonstration of how we "can all get along?" Are you in the clutches of denial LVD? Do you not see yourself in the same trap?
It's interesting how many conservatives come to this board and do EXACTLY the same thing you are doing, and yet they do not see themselves. Is it because conservatives are more self-righteous than liberals and are imbued with their own sense of perfection and righteousness? Maybe you can explain this phenomenon to me>
Think about this LVD -- only the LUCKY ONES grow old; all the rest of us die young. You are obviously young because you insult the old. Do you really want to die young or would you rather grow old and be insulted by a prejudiced young punk like yourself when you grow old? The degree to which you are prejudiced against old age is the degree to which prejudice will reversed on you if you are lucky enough to also grow old. The prejudice will come from your own memory wherin you have implanted the seeds of prejudice as you have today with Witch Hazel.
Another thing, LVD, where did you get the idea that all the top technology professionals are conservatives and all the techno-incompetent are liberals? Doesn't that make you look extremely stupid?
"Jeepers, you conservatives are nasty people"
”can’t we all just get along…”
:-)
-SF Liberals
Name: Kenn Starr - Take that Torquemada!
email: Eric Alterman - MSNBC
Message: Revelations of Ken Starr’s stealth taint his case and fuel the growing backlash NEW YORK, Oct. 15 — More than two-thirds of Americans approve of the job President Clinton is doing. Nearly seven in ten also believe an impeachment investigation to be unnecessary. And Kenneth Starr, the Republican Torquemada given unlimited powers and moneys to pry into the personal life of the president grows more discredited by the minute. How long can this go on?
Republicans seeking to overturn the 1996 election should have been careful enough to chose a prosecutor who is untainted by earlier associations with the anti-Clinton cabal.
THE NEWEST EVIDENCE of Starr’s unfitness for the job to which he was appointed involves the degree of his previously undisclosed consultations with Paula Jones’ lawyers in 1994. Readers may be aware that when a panel of three conservative judges appointed Starr, they willingly overlooked his apparent readiness to file an amicus brief on Jones’ behalf owing to his enthusiasm for her case.
National Public Radio disclosed this week that Starr’s role went even further. Former Jones lawyer Gilbert K. Davis admitted that he consulted with Starr between four to six times about the case before the latter was appointed independent counsel in 1994. Starr did not inform Attorney General Janet Reno of these stealth consultations when he asked her to approve the expansion of his Whitewater investigation (Remember Whitewater?) into the Jones/Lewinsky territory.
CLEARLY COMPROMISED According to any number of Constitutional scholars familiar with the intent of the Independent Counsel law, these meetings clearly compromised Starr’s impartiality before the fact. Had Reno been made aware of them, it is likely that she might have considered appointing a special prosecutor whose claim to impartiality was not so tainted.
Starr and Davis insist that the consultations involved only Constitutional issues regarding the president’s claim of immunity. Perhaps so, but how are we to verify this? Only recently, we have learned of the deep involvement with the Jones legal team of Starr’s law partner at Kirkland, Ellis, Richard W. Porter.
Lucianne Goldberg has said she called Porter, in Chicago, for help in getting a high-level contact at Starr’s office for Linda Tripp to call. Porter then called Jerome M. Marcus of Philadelphia, a member (with Ann Coulter) of Jones’ informal ‘kitchen cabinet’ of pro-bono lawyers. At one point, Marcus was on the line with Porter,” Goldberg told a reporter. In addition to Porter, Marcus had another law school friend, Paul S. Rosenzweig, who was on Starr’s staff in Washington.
So not only was Starr consulting with the Jones lawyers, and considering amicus briefs, but so, even more deeply, were members of his firm. Yet the independent counsel law prohibits law partners of independent counsels from representing anyone “involved in any investigation or prosecution under this chapter.
TAINTED PROSECUTOR
Certainly Starr apologists will argue that neither his nor
Porter’s efforts on behalf of Jones rises to the level of “
representation.” Technically, this is true, since no money passed
through anyone’s hands. (Starr did not need the money. He earns more
than $1 million a year, while he simultaneously conducts this investigation
by representing tobacco companies, among others.) But think about it:
Congress is about to impeach a president for lying about adultery.
His privacy rights have been shredded, to say nothing of poor Ms. Lewinsky, whose innermost thoughts and feelings have been ripped out of her heart and splashed across the Internet under the threat of jail. The country is against it and believes the entire matter to be politically motivated. One would think that the Republicans seeking to overturn the 1996 election would be careful enough to chose a prosecutor who is untainted by earlier associations with the anti-Clinton cabal.
SLIMY BEHAVIOR Instead we have Ken Starr, who has consulted with the Jones team and whose law partners have as well. He has accepted — and then rejected — an offer of a cushy job from anti-Clinton conspirator numero uno, Richard Mellon Scaife, and accepted lecture fees from Jerry Falwell, who himself has sold videotapes that accuse the president of being a murderer. And contrary to the law’s explicit guidelines, his office has deliberately leaked information designed to further his investigation and intimidate his critics.
Impeachment, we are told over and over, is the most sacred duty Congress can undertake save declaring war. And yet we are about to embark on that process — unsupported by the American people — solely on the basis of evidence gathered by a prosecutor whose political partisanship is undeniable and whose political judgement is even worse.
None of this is meant to exonerate President Clinton for the slimy way he has conducted himself in office, nor for the shame and dishonor he has brought on his own head through his personal conduct and lies. But to raise the personal to the level of the impeachable is not only anti-Constitutional, it is near totalitarian.
Clinton may be a scoundrel, but Ken Starr is a genuine danger to the sanctity of our political system. Let’s hope voters tell the Republican Congress just what they think of his investigation come November. It may be our only hope.
Name:
email:
Message: 
Name: Protect Your Messages from Kenneth Starr
email: LAST Safe Haven for Your Opinions
Message:
Here, on this forum, may be one of the LAST PLACES in America where you still have some vestige of privacy, and are virtually safe from Starr and members of the American Taliban.
There's little time to wake your neighbors
But it's not too late - Make haste!
Name: Last Visible Dog to SF Liberals
email:
Message:
“You called Witch Hazel a "douche bag"
As supporters (notice I did not add “athletic”) of Clinton, you should understand parsing language better than that. I did not at any time call Witch Hazel a “douche bag” – I simply mused about the availability of the moniker (it was your mind that filled in the messing details). I would never call any names (directly). The most important point is – I was trying to funny using razor wit. It was Witch Hazel that started the personal attached toward this humble dog.
“Then you refer to her as "VERY old" in derogatory terms.”
Check the context. Witch Hazel made a comment about me not being up creating HTML with the “grown-ups” (strangely enough, Witch Hazel’s comment about HTML has been censored/deleted). Well, I am 39 and grown-up are people that are much older (20-30 years), so Witch Hazel most be pushing 70. BTW – the statement was sarcasm in response to an attach on me. NOTE: In real-life, I never want to become a “grown-up” and I am happy to be a kid all my life (at least in my outlook on life and new things).
“a prejudiced young punk like yourself “
Thank you – I just turned 39 this month and the though of 40 is a wee bit frightening so I really appreseate being called a “young punk”. Thank you – you made my day.
“Another thing, LVD, where did you get the idea that all the top technology professionals are conservatives and all the techno-incompetent are liberals? Doesn't that make you look extremely stupid?”
Oh come on – everybody knows that conservative are better looking, have more money, are more educated, have better sex, know the punch-line to most inside jokes, are better at technology, run faster, jump higher, and are the ones the hold this entire country – yea, the world – together.
(that was a joke)
(you liberals do have a sense of humor – don’t you?)
Epilogue (just like the old FBI tv show):
I made a comment about losing carriage-returns and duplicating my message (yes, I did it) and Witch Hazel made some snide personal attacks on this humble dog so I responded in kind. I harbor no ill will toward anybody…….come everybody, group hug.
I am feeling a lot of love in here……
-LVD
Name: Last Visible Dog to Big Liberal Brother
email:
Message:
OK – I see somebody has altered my monker from “Last Visible Dog” to “Last Visible Paranoid Dog” Well, now you have really hurt my feelings and I am going to take my ball, I mean computer, and go home.
I should know better than to mess with the ones that control the web page content
Name: Last Visible Dog that can't type
email:
Message: "PS. I never realized Monica had such drumpy breasts. Who says you can't learn something from the Hillary.org web site?"
Opps - that was supposed to be "droopy" breasts (I was trying to type too fast, you know us young punks)
Name: Last Visible Dog (flipping on the light switch of reality)
email:
Message: STARR currently has HIGHER personal approval ratings than Clinton – The Vast Lunatic Left’s personal attacks on Ken Starr have failed – Clinton’s personal approval rating is hovering at the same level of Nixon in 1974 (the low 30’s)– Clinton apologists are reeling.
Name: SF Liberals to Last Visibly Shaken Dog
email:
Message: We didn't mean to hurt your feelings, LVD, but we have a push-pull relationship. At once you say something that makes us want to love you, then you say something that reins us up short -- real short, and we would like to bite you instead!
You have a great sense of humor though, and we appreciate that a lot, especially coming from a conservative! :-)
But you have a really nice side to you, which is unusual. If there were more conservatives with your sense of humor we liberals would even consider giving up all our hard earned civil liberties, our freedom, our right to privacy, our pleasures, our free will, our kinky six toys, etc., and join the righteous right! But alas! One humorous, youngish, punkish, conservative does not a political party make.
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/cp-usa/ & http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm
Name: SF Liberals to Last Visible Reality-Challenged Dog
email:
Message: Just as I was reading "Amy Musher's Mailbag" in this weeks Time Magazine your last message came down. Here's how it goes in the Liberal Times:
Mail in favor of Bill Clinton 1,680
Against 1,589
Mail in favor of Kenneth Starr 59
Against 1,052
NOWHERE, but nowhere, in any respectable poll have we ever found favorable ratings for Kenneth Starr who is everybody's nightmare, including yours, if you would be punk enough to admit it!
Do you really want Kenny peeking through the keyhole of you bedroom door? Do you really want Kenny telling you where, when and with whom you should have sex? Come on LVD, you can't fool us. Anyone who looks at Monica's drumpy breasts is not going to tolerate "peeping Ken."
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message: 
dis be masta p and you gonna listen to me rappin to da beat on da street to da elite chew on da html an ya dont feel swell se ya in hell
peace
Name: check us out
email: we got de rap too
Message: HTTP://WWW.HARTFORD-HWP.COM/CP-USA/
Name: Conservative Libertarian
email: reality@america.com
Message: Right Wing Republicans will try to argue, just refuse to listen. Turn off the TV when they start.
That's right - don't listen. Don't think. And don't bother to find out which candidate will do the best job representing you in Congress and vote accordingly. Let those who know what's best for you do the thinking and decide which way you should vote.
Name: Conservative Libertarian
email: reality@america.com
Message: The Demonstration in Washington D.C. is planned for Saturday Oct 24,1998 at Noon ...
Exerpt from the Washington Post's report on the rally:
WASHINGTON -- A rally held Saturday at the Ellipse to support President
Clinton, billed as the first national assembly advertised over the Internet,
drew a crowd of just over 100 people.
And that's if you count the dog walkers, joggers, baby strollers and journalists stopping by.
The organizers were hoping for 1000 people to attend, but only about 100 showed up. Could it be that the highly touted 'backlash' is 10 times smaller than advertised?
Name: The President of Peace
email:
Message:
Name: MNSBC
email:
Message:
Name: MNSBC
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message: www.hartford-hwp.com/cp-usa????? Ha Ha Ha I hope even the liberals are not stupid enough to fall for that scam. Communists!
Name: MNSBC
email:
Message:
Name: mideast beast
email:
Message: the whole mideast peace treaty is just another sham, a favor by netenYAHOO for his pal slick willie to help make him look more presidential. anyone who believes this treaty has any balls to is is in dreamland.
Name: Pamela Anderson
email:
Message: Congratulations president Clinton on your victory in the Middle East. You deserve a LOT of blowjobs for that. I'm lining up the best looking women for you right now. And don't worry about Ken Starr, we'll invite him to watch!
Name: Last Visible Dog
email:
Message:
Oh boy, another election cycle and another phony/ain’t-worth-the-paper-it-is-not-written-on peace agreement with Israel and Palestine. If Clinton is the super statesman, why didn’t the last agreement he put together work? This agreement is just more meaningless Clinton window dressing – only duped liberals think this agreement means anything. Party on liberal dudes...
Sorry about your rally - so much for the backlash. Judging by the polls, Republicans are going to win big next week. American will speak – the will of the people will be known. Bill –weasel boy- Clinton is going down…….can I get an AMEN!
Name:
email: SF Liberals to Last Visible Dog
Message: Last Visible Dog -- You are a fun guy! We really like you! Come back often. I don't know what papers you are reading to get your facts, but that's OK we still think you are neat.
Name:
email:
Message: 
We Love LVD
Name:
email:
Message:
Again, again in a virtual gang rape
For your arousal I exposed her entirely
I made you cum in a world-wide gang-bang
A first! You've never done that before
Signal me when you're ready for more
I'll entrap again for your pleasure
Another Demo maiden you'll adore!"
Name: CG
email:
Message:
Name: CG
email:
Message: Last Visible Dog is my hero! (Love the java dude!) Ha Ha Ha Ha Last Visible Dog is (truly) a fun guy!!!
Name:
email:
Message: 
The president and his personal Piece
Name:
email:
Message: 
Name: Angelpuss
email: Love@xUSA.com
Message: All I want to say is get out and vote, everyone in the country MUST get out and vote. Let's see what the American people really want though the ballot box. A lot of blowhards on this forum first think that other people care about what they think, and, poor deluded things, think that they can change other peoples' minds by yelling and swearing at them. Where is the civilized political discourse of yore?
NOW VOTE, Y'ALL!
Name: Witch Hazel
email: Witch@teats.com
Message: Hello y'all. I was very amused the way LVD tore into me. My my, touchy aren't we? Just wanna be loved by all and get away with as much as possible. Like most boys, I guess. I had my last boy a couple of hundred years ago, yummy. Now I am not so fussy since I am older and not quite as attractive as I used to be. Of course I can still cast spells, but that's cheating. I prefer consensual sex!! And lots of it!! I guess I can learn to like Peeping Toms as well, since Starr seems to be determined to be everywhere. What a circus!
Name: SF Liberals to Last Visible Dog
email: We Love It!!
Message: And we didn't even think you could do html!! Well... you sure showed us your stuff! You are Everywoman's Forum Fantasy! The darling of our network. What a guy!
Coupla questions:
1. How did you arrive at your interesting moniker?
2. Could you.. eh.. do some more technology tricks for us?
Name: Hot Democrat
email: Proposition@whitehouse.gov
Message: Yes, LVD you should switch parties. You may make more money, but we do have more fun. Your leaders have set policy regarding who you can have sex with, when, where; what you can and cannot use, can and cannot do. Liberals only require that it's consensual, respectful and responsible, but not to the extent that we usurp the forces of nature by the use of political or religious edicts that remove the magic and the mysticism from the act.
Yes, I think the Oval Office would be thrilling if we could pull that off without getting caught like you know who. Want to give it a shot? A small donation to the Democratic Party and some things could be overlooked. We could do it in the Lincoln bedroom. That would be something to tell our friends when we get home.
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name: Steve
email: theares1@aol.com
Message: I find it funny when you open your mouth. Try thinking first it might help some. You can run in New York but not in a state in the mid-west. But I do hope you do a good job for the United States. Your a smart person but please think that the people in the mid-west tink differnt then the west and east coast. Good luck with your new seat and the GOP should treat you fair. Steve
Name: luci luciano
email: lucivet@aol.com
Message: Good for you Hilary! I am from California but I admire you and how hard you work for the good of us women. you have a very happy smile and are so sincere, I am very proud that you represent America as a first lady and now a senator.
Name: jack Waterhouse
email: jackoldorc@aol.com
Message: What kind of a Webb page is this?? it reflects the ego of the Clintons. It is nice that they are out of the Whitehouse and we have a couple with good moral values. Mrs. Clinton has no better values than her husband. She had to select a very liberal state, full of people "on the dole" in order to get elected. Why didn't Mrs. Clinton run in her home state?
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name: Mike Rotch
email: Lostb alls
Message: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz I know my abc's. How about you Ms. Clinton?
Name: Mike Rotch
email: Lostb alls
Message: I like to be a funny guy like Last Visible Dog, But couldn't he have chosen a better name? Just say my name to your co-workers today. See what they have to say!
Name: Mike Rotch
email: Lostb alls
Message: Do you want to know how i found this web site? well if you don't i got a big cock for YOU! This is for those who do want to know. 1) First go to www.altavista.com 2) Tpye in these exact words "witch teats" You have to use the qoutes as well. 3) It should be the third result that comes up
Name: Mike Rotch
email: Lostb alls
Message: I hope you got the joke because if you didn't then head on over to 1111 kiss my ass lane in Maimi Florida. 3/2/03
Name: Mike Rotch
email: Lostb alls
Message: If any one is trying to figure out where i got the name then just watch uno episope of el simpsons That means bart
Name: Mike Rotch
email:
Message: got to go doing a project. you were fun website
Name: Mike Rotch
email: Lostb alls
Message: P.S. I am mentally insane. if the guy with the electric club finds out that i have this computer he'll beat the crap out of me. Shit hes coming!
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message:
Name:
email:
Message: